Picking by catalogue size
Every serious option has millions of tracks. Catalogue size hasn't been the differentiator for years; programming and licensing are.
Search for the best restaurant music system and you'll get a list of products, each claiming to be the answer. The honest truth is that the question is wrong. There's no universal best — there's what fits your concept, your number of zones, your appetite for managing it, and your licensing exposure. The operators who get this right don't pick a brand; they pick on four criteria and let the answer fall out.
The market mixes three different kinds of thing under one phrase. There are consumer playlist apps (Spotify, Apple Music) that were never built for venues. There are licensed business-music catalogues (Spotify Business via partners, Soundtrack Your Brand and similar) that solve the licence but leave the curation to you. And there are managed services where a human programmes and maintains the sound for you. Comparing them as if they're the same product is how venues end up disappointed.
What actually separates a good fit from a bad one is rarely the size of the catalogue — they're all enormous. It's whether the system follows your day, whether it covers the licensing layers that apply where you operate, whether staff can quietly break it, and how much of your week it asks for in upkeep.
A single-zone café and a five-zone hotel have genuinely different needs, and a system that's perfect for one is overkill or underpowered for the other. The right comparison is against your own situation, not against a leaderboard.
Every serious option has millions of tracks. Catalogue size hasn't been the differentiator for years; programming and licensing are.
A consumer account is cheapest and the worst fit — ads, no public-performance licence, anyone can change it. Price only means something next to fit.
Licensed catalogues solve the licence but hand you the curation. The plan to 'refresh the playlists monthly' rarely survives a busy quarter.
First, dayparting: can the system play a genuinely different mood for brunch, afternoon, sunset, dinner and late, automatically, or does someone have to switch it? Second, licensing: does it cover the public-performance layers (PRO/PPL equivalents) that apply in the UAE and the Gulf, or only the streaming licence? Third, control: can staff change the volume but not the source — or can anyone swap it for their own taste? Fourth, upkeep: who keeps it fresh, you or the provider?
Score the options against those four for your specific venue and the answer stops being a brand-versus-brand argument. A small single-zone venue with someone happy to curate might be well served by a licensed catalogue. A multi-zone premium venue, or any operator who doesn't want music to be a weekly task, is usually better with managed curation.
Soniqo sits in that last category by design — daypart-programmed by a curator, licensing handled as one line for the UAE and Gulf, a source the floor can't swap, refreshed monthly. That's the right answer for some venues and not for others; the four criteria tell you which you are.
Operators almost always start by asking which system is best. The useful version of the question is 'best for what' — once we walk through dayparting, licensing, control and upkeep for their actual venue, the choice usually makes itself, and sometimes the answer is that they don't need us yet.
Both are licensed business-music catalogues, which puts them ahead of a personal account. The trade-off is that they're largely self-serve: you get the licence and the catalogue, but the curation and the daypart programming are still your job. They fit operators who want to run the sound themselves; a managed service fits operators who don't.
Usually one system that supports multiple zones, not multiple systems. The point is that a lobby, a restaurant and a pool can each carry their own profile while staying coherent as one brand. Fragmenting across separate apps is how a venue ends up sounding like three different places.
A commercially-licensed source with the public-performance layers covered — not a consumer subscription. Our Core tier ($300/month) is that as a managed single-zone setup; a self-serve licensed catalogue can be cheaper if you're willing to do the curation and confirm your own licensing coverage.
Score each on dayparting, licensing coverage for your country, source control, and who handles upkeep — for your specific venue. The 'best' system is whichever wins on the criteria that matter to how your room runs, not whichever tops a generic list.
Tell us your concept and how many zones you run, and we'll give you an honest read on whether managed curation fits — or whether a self-serve catalogue is enough for now.